A marital agreement can be as simple or complex as a couple needs it. They may contain specific clauses that assign certain real estate or assert general rights to percentages of the matrimonial estate. These agreements can be covered by the Indian Contract Act 1872. Section 10 of the Indian Contracts Act states that agreements must be considered contracts when they are concluded by the free consent of the parties.  Section 23 of the same statute states that a contract may be non-sour if it is immoral or contrary to public policy.  It is possible that some relevant characteristics, unique for millennia (born from 1981 to 1996), contributed to the adoption by their generation of pre-marital agreements. Millennials marry later than previous generations. In 1965, the average American married at the age of 21 and the typical American man married at 23. In 2017, these figures have risen to 27 years for women and 29.5 years for men.
(Source: Pew Research Center, How millennials are compared to their grandparents 50 years ago, March 16, 2018.) One of the oldest marital arrangements ever found was a 2000-year-old Hebrew marriage contract. Scholars have found legal agreements that can be described as marital agreements in Ancient Egypt. The European custom of dowry is a form of early prenup and dates from at least the ninth century. It is even said that king edward IV of England had a marriage with his wife Eleanor Butler, signed between 1461 and 1464. The 2010 Supreme Court`s Radmacher/Granatino trial case overturned the current legal framework to recognize the changing social and judicial views on the personal autonomy of spouses.   Pre-marriage agreements can now be applied by the courts within their discretion in financial settlement cases under Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, as long as the three-tiered cycling test is completed and is considered fair in the interests of each child in the family. The cyclo-cyclo-maker requests that the courts effectively arrange a marriage agreement freely concluded by each party with a full assessment of its effects, unless, in the present circumstances, it is not fair for the parties to maintain their agreement. The case provided important guidelines, relevant to all marriage agreements that have occurred since 2010.  Two legislative amendments have made marriage contracts much more frequent. It was about the creation of divorce laws and community property laws.
Many states, led by California, have begun to facilitate divorce. They no longer needed to prove that the marriage was someone`s fault. You could decide to get a divorce. Many mistake-free states have also become condominiums. This meant that the legal assumption was that each property accumulated during the marriage had to be shared equally between the two parties in the context of a divorce. Today, marital contracts are notarized contracts which, in the event of divorce, impose a division of the estate. While prenups can be used to protect women`s finances in the event of divorce, they are generally intended to protect the best interests of both spouses. The law now considers marriage contracts to be essential documents for the equitable distribution of property.
In any event, certain conditions must be met for a marriage agreement to be considered valid by the American courts: the agreement must be written; They must be carried out on a voluntary basis; It must be a full and fair disclosure of all financial assets at the time of execution; it cannot be unacceptable; and it must be carried out by both parties “in a manner necessary for the recording of an act,” or recognition before a notary.